Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Vicky Hampton's avatar

Thanks for the mention! I agree that the AI genie cannot be put back in the bottle and we basically need to get on board or be left behind. But I do take issue with this: "You are the one giving the platform value because it’s only as good as the data you upload." If only it were the case that we were all training our own models with our own data. Instead, the models are being trained on the output of millions of writers, illustrators and creators in general who never gave permission for their work to be plagiarised for zero money by absolutely anyone. AI might be here to stay whether we like it or not, but I agree with Stacey's earlier post that it's inherently unethical.

Expand full comment
David Mastro Scheidt's avatar

I remember the early debates around digital cameras versus film and the editing tools that are now commonplace on our phones. There are some parallels here with AI. Was it a ‘real’ photograph if someone retouched it digitally? Are we developing film? Bringing it to the Foto-Mat? Are we even printing those photographic memories anymore? Nah, we’re just scrolling 10,000 digitally enhanced photos on our phone without a thought anymore. Enhanced color? Easy. Black and White? Done. Sure, the real photo enthusiasts care, the hard-core folks still using film, studying light, backpack of gear. And then there’s the rest of us, happy to take photos with a convenient camera phone that can increase the contrast with a button click.

Wine and photo enthusiasts may have some things to discuss in the future, like adaptation to new tools. Yeah, I’d listen to what Jensen has to say too. You’re right Corinne, the AI-genie isn’t going back in the bottle, Somms and other industry people better figure out how to use it best in their line of work.

Thank you for the “must read” regarding my post. Appreciate the shout out.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts